When we are considering whether a category is viable and worth pursuing, what should we take into account?

Viewed 20

This year, I've gradually shifted my focus to product selection, but as I observe more, I find that some categories, although they don't look promising, really aren't. Some categories appear good, but there's a distinction between those that are actually good and those that aren't as good in reality. It seems like I've overlooked something.

When considering whether a category is viable and worth pursuing, what should we actually consider? For example, some categories have a good overall volume and trend, decent estimated gross profit margin and profit, are not dominated by leading players, and have relatively even order distribution. From the ratings, it seems like the market is already saturated. Is it still worth pursuing such categories? Finding an entry point is quite challenging, and I have yet to summarize a feasible method and standard for judgment. When selecting products, from which dimensions should we consider? Gross profit margin, profit, turnover, competition intensity, demand stability, future trends, infringement risk, degree of differentiation, and entry point?

I am not from a development background, nor am I a diligent or naturally gifted player, just an ordinary e-commerce practitioner. I don't want to, and can't afford to, stand still. So, what should we consider when selecting products? Above are my confused ramblings~

4 Answers

Today, while planning a new direction, I'd like to share a few thoughts. The main question is how to evaluate whether a category is worth pursuing.

We can divide the evaluation criteria into three categories, which roughly correspond to the different stages of our Amazon journey and the product development methods we applied.

First Stage:

I entered the cross-border e-commerce industry in 2016, so let's set 2015-2018 as the first stage (though this timeline might differ from others' views). This was the era of rapid, unchecked growth. If there are old sellers here, they might remember that doing Amazon was almost like picking up money, with some products having gross margins as high as 300%. I recall that launching a product could take from a week to a month, though not all launches were successful. If a product failed, we moved on to the next one. Initially, we developed products based on whatever resources we had or by copying profitable products from friends or other sellers. The most notable example was the karaoke microphones. By 2017, we no longer just followed others but started conducting product research to determine projects. We primarily considered market size, competition level, and profit before proceeding. (Anyone else had bosses who set criteria like over 30% profit margin and more than 50 daily sales? Raise your hand!)

Second Stage:

From 2018-2019, many sellers made substantial profits, with some even buying houses in Shenzhen Bay. I call this the development stage. Companies were expanding, and you could hear stories of Amazon success everywhere in Shenzhen. Even downstream service providers started advertising in the metro. How did they make their money? Through various tricks, gift cards, fake orders, etc. In 2017, I remember one of our top products had its main image changed by a vendor central (VC) account, followed by constant follow selling. Sellers from that era probably encountered similar experiences. These events set the stage for the second phase of Amazon. If others could change main images and follow sell, why not create more accounts and boost a bit? So, we started expanding and playing tricks, though some companies stuck to pure white-hat practices, focusing on meticulous work. Due to different company scales and budgets, some sellers didn’t blindly boost sales. For example, in the US marketplace, some companies only boosted 10-20 orders, some 30-50, and some reserved 2000 items and boosted 500. At this stage, product development considerations included market size, competition level, profit, and whether the product fit us. Could we handle the competition's boosted orders? Could our company manage large items and high unit prices? Could we match a link that got a thousand reviews a month?

Third Stage:

From 2021 onwards, we can consider this the third stage, with a special period from 2020-2021 due to the pandemic, which led to a peak in cross-border e-commerce. Most products saw significant growth, with some sellers getting lost in this wave. This continued until May 2021, when a public company collapsed, and big sellers faced frequent suspensions from June to August. This served as a wake-up call for all Amazon sellers. After unsuccessful appeals, many sellers started new accounts, repackaging and clearing out inventory, or even clearing inventory across platforms. Thus began what I call the sedimentation stage. After these events, we learned a lesson: don't put all your eggs in one basket. Many sellers began diversifying with independent sites, Shopee, and other platforms. By 2021, those who entered the industry before 2020 had accumulated some experience. Sellers started adjusting their business directions and streamlining their SKUs. At this point, product development considerations included whether the category could be sustained. We often see forum posts asking what else to do if Amazon isn't an option anymore. I used to wonder the same thing until recently, when I realized that if we can become experts in an industry, we can fulfill the same needs on different platforms in different ways. So, in the third sedimentation stage, we focus more on whether the industry can last three, five, ten years, or even longer.

Recently, I've been learning things beyond Amazon. Regardless of your experience level in this industry, this might be relevant. Some people may have made money due to the times or opportunities. Money is just an IOU from the world. As long as you provide value to society, you will get a return, sooner or later.

1.First, before considering whether a category is viable, you need to assess your financial strength and risk tolerance. Position yourself by determining what cost range of products you can handle to avoid significant mistakes since no product has a 100% success rate. Errors are inevitable, but they shouldn't result in substantial losses.For example: How much can you afford for the initial batch of goods? What is your budget? How many external resources can you provide?

2.Once you've determined your cost range, you can roughly decide which categories are viable. If you have significant resources, you can try high-ticket items. If the initial batch cost is lower, then opt for low-ticket items.

3.After selecting a category, research the overall market for the product. Consider the following dimensions:
▪️Is the market dominated by a few major players?
▪️Are the overall ratings acceptable?
▪️Is there room for breaking through in the market?
▪️What are the customer pain points? Can you address these pain points?
▪️Can differentiation help bridge the gap between you and the existing sellers' reviews?
▪️If there is no room for market penetration, can the overall profit margin support you in using pricing to bridge the gap with competitors?
▪️Is the market stable? If yes, proceed; if not, withdraw.

4.If the market looks promising, assess whether your resources can support market penetration. Unlike in 2019/2020, even a strong product might not break through due to intense competition. Evaluate the category’s conversion rate, CPC prices, top competitors, and growth curve of new sellers (including off-site efforts, review growth, pricing, discounts, etc.). Determine how many reviews are needed for significant sales growth. With this information, you can estimate your cost per order and decide if it is acceptable.
For example, if the conversion rate for core keywords is 10%, as a new product, it might be 6%-8%. If the suggested bid for precise CPC is $1, your initial CPC cost per order might be around $15. If the unit price is $30, your first phase advertising ACOS might be around 50%.

5.Consider your advertising budget and other costs to ensure they are within an acceptable range. This year, I've seen many products with unit prices in the teens and CPCs exceeding $2. For highly competitive products, either you be the first to market and seize early opportunities, have a distinct product advantage, or engage in price wars until the end.

This is my humble opinion; please forgive any mistakes.

Personal opinion, no offense intended.

In reality, there’s no category that can’t be done. Whether a category is feasible depends more on the company's level of support and operational capabilities.

Take the example of the swimming pool robots that became extremely popular in the first half of this year. The initial investment in manpower and resources for this product line was over tens of millions. For most small companies, investing directly in a project worth tens of millions, especially an unknown one, would lead 99.99% of companies to abandon it. To them, this is a garbage product line.

However, for a company like Aiper that invested in this product line, it was an untapped market for Chinese sellers. Leveraging the advantage of Chinese manufacturing, they were able to bring down the average unit price from over a thousand dollars to around two hundred dollars, a significant competitive edge. For them, this was a great product line.

So, whether a product line can be pursued depends on the level of support from the company.

If you’re asking whether a product is worth doing, plz consider following aspects:

1.Barriers to entry determine the future competition and profit margin for your brand.

2.Profit is directly related to the current stage of market development.
Why don't people choose to sell on Taobao? Because after deducting promotional expenses, there's no profit.
Why is there no profit? Because the platform has entered a decline phase.
Why don't people sell outdoor string lights on Amazon anymore? Because the top sellers already have no profit left, so how could you?

3.Future trends determine whether you can develop sustainably. If a sub-category is full of low-cost items around $10 with no barriers to entry, it will inevitably become a fiercely competitive battlefield in the future